MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2358938849

Sex related knowledge,attitudes and behaviors among middle school students in Shanghai city

2007· article· en· W2358938849 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chaohua Lou

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Public Health · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPremarital sexPsychologyQuarter (Canadian coin)Middle EastMiddle levelSex educationSchool teachersMiddle ageSexual behaviorDemographyDevelopmental psychologyMedical educationMathematics educationMedicineGeographySociologyPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To understand sex related knowledge,attitudes and behaviors among middle school students in Shanghai.Methods A total of 3 069 grade one junior high or senior high middle school students from 11 middle schools in one district of Shanghai were interviewed by using anonymous self-administered questionnaire.Results The knowledge scores of middle and high school students were rather low with the mean score being 33.85 and 55.08 respectively,while their attitudes toward sexual issues were relatively open.About four fifth of the high school students and more than half of the middle school students approved or accepted premarital sexual behavior.A quarter of the high school students and 6 percent of the middle school students ever dated or had a hug with opposite sex.Conclusion With the increase of age,middle school students were more likely to hold an open attitude to sex and were more likely to have sex related behaviors.However,they had poor knowledge on reprodctive health.It was necessary to strengthen family and school sex education in Shanghai.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.489
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Journal of Public HealthSame topicAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthFrench-language works237,207