Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper selected old and new wheat seeds of Zhou 18 and Bainong AK 58 as the experimental material.First,old and new seed vigor were measured through the non-special processing germination experiment,aging treatment germination experiment and anti-freeze processing germination experiment of wheat.Then,with the method of measuring absorb light,the activities of peroxidase(POD),superoxide dismutase(SOD) and catalase(CAT) of old and new seeds were measured.Results demonstrated that the rate of germination of the new seed of the same kind of wheat under the three conditions was significantly greater than that of the old seeds.Also the new seeds' peroxidase,superoxide dismutase and catalase were more active than the old seeds'.This proved that the new seeds' vigor was greater than that of the old seeds and the seed vigor and activity of peroxidase,superoxide dismutase and catalase were positive correlation.In addition,from the related data of Zhou 18 and AK 58,it could be concluded that the seed's vitality and stability of AK 58 were obviously superior to Zhou 18.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".