MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2359028789

The Application Research of the TRMM Precipitation Data in the Provincial Scale—A Case Study of Liaoning Province

2015· article· en· W2359028789 on OpenAlexaff
FU Yuan-yua

Bibliographic record

VenueAnhui nongye kexue · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecipitationEnvironmental scienceClimatologyScale (ratio)Spring (device)GeographyPhysical geographyMeteorologyGeologyCartography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the monthly precipitation data of Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission(TRMM) 3B43 from January 1998 to December2010,a case study as the provincial scale,the change of recent 13-year precipitation in Liaoning Province were analyzed by means of the liner climatic tendencies ratio method and Geographical Information System(GIS) spatial analytic techniques. Some conclusions can be drawn: The linear correlation between TRMM precipitation data and observed data and is very high,the data has a higher accuracy; The annual precipitation in Liaoning Province is mainly between 425-1 082 mm,and the overall performance is the trend of decreasing from the southeast to the northwest; The main precipitation concentrate in May to September of each year,the precipitation during this period accounted for more than 70% of the total annual precipitation,among them,the maximum precipitation concentrate in July,to 20% of the annual precipitation,and in February the minimum,less 2% of the annual precipitation,seasonal change is obvious; In recent 13 years,the average annual precipitation showed increasing trend in Liaoning Province. However,the summer precipitation showed a decreasing trend,the precipitation in the western and middle Liaoning Province is particularly evident. These indicate that in recent 13 years,the phenomenon of regional drought in spring and summer is serious.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnhui nongye kexueSame topicEnvironmental and Agricultural SciencesFrench-language works237,207