MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2359119164

Zero Digital Image Watermarking Method Against Rotation Attack Based On Block DCT Transform

2010· article· en· W2359119164 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
He Bing

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital watermarkingRotation (mathematics)Computer scienceComputer visionTranslation (biology)WatermarkArtificial intelligenceDiscrete cosine transformBlock (permutation group theory)ScramblingImage (mathematics)Distortion (music)Noise (video)Digital imageAlgorithmImage processingMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The existing digital image watermarking method based on DWT without resisting to geometric attack ability,for example,the image is rotated by little angles and the author could not detect watermark. In order to improve the zero digital image watermarking method against rotation attack ability,the paper proposes one method based on DWT,which can against rotation attack ability efficiently. For rotation causing distortion,we make use of LPM (log-polar maping),which can transform rotation problem in Castesian coordinate to translation property in LPM coordinate. after translation,we use an exhaustive search to detect test image involves watermarking or not. The experiment results demonstrate the proposed method can obtain better visual effect,meanwhile,it is robust enough to some image degradation process such as adding noise,cropping,filtering and JPEG compression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesFrench-language works237,207