MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2359159465

Investigation on common-rail fuel system for rotary valved pulse detonation engine

2011· article· en· W2359159465 on OpenAlexaff
NI Cheng-qun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Propulsion Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommon railAutomotive engineeringDiesel fuelEngineeringFuel injectionDiesel engineFuel supplyDetonationMicrosecondExplosive material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To improve the high frequency performance of the PDE fuel supply system,common rail technology as the leading technology in diesel engine was adopted to develop a new fuel supply system named CRP.We also researched the control performance,flow performance and dynamic response performance of the CRP.The results illustrate that injecting time can be controlled to the microsecond level and the difference of each injection in all tubes can be controlled within 5%,as well as the dynamic response time can be less than 1ms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Propulsion TechnologySame topicCombustion and Detonation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207