Bibliographic record
Abstract
Suffolk sheep were superovulated by the method of CIDR+FSH+PG and then the embryos were collected from the corners of uterus on the 6th day after estrus and matingThe average number of embryos per sheep was 689±262 (372/54),the average number of useful embryos per sheep was 607±228(328/54),The effects on superovulation of Suffolk sheep were studied from the aspects as following:different FSHin different countries,LRH-A3+P4 injected or not ,repeated superovulation and ovary in left or in righeResults showed that the effect of superovulation by native FSH made in Canada and FSHmade in Japan were better than the others,the useful embryos per sheep were 920±164(n=10)and 775±167(n=16) respectively; 725±118(n=16)of useful embryo was obtained in the group theat injected LRH+P4,which is remarkably higher than that of the control group of 411±138(n=9);The number of useful embryo per sheep of the second time was 919±339(n=16)heigher than that of the first time 600±327(n=16)in repeated superovulation group (the interval is 12 months)There was no obviously difference in the number of useful embryos between left ovary and right ovary
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".