MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2359162969

Isolation and Identification of Antagonistic Bacteria Against Postharvest Blue Mold Decay of Apple and Its Mutation by Low Energy N~+ Implantation

2015· article· en· W2359162969 on OpenAlexaff
FU Rui-mi

Bibliographic record

VenueNorthern Horticulture · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlue moldMutantBacillus amyloliquefaciensPostharvestMoldBiologyBiological pest controlStrain (injury)FermentationFood scienceWild typeBotanyHorticultureMicrobiologyPenicillium expansumBiochemistryGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Taking an antagonistic strain BA-16 which could inhibit Penicillium expansumisolated from apple surface as metarial,phenotypic,physiological,biochemical and phylogenetic(16SrRNA)charactors were studied.The strain BA-16 was identified as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.In order to enhance its antagonistic capability,the mutation of BA-16 was carried out by using low energy N+implantation.After the mutation,the mutant BA-16-8,which showed the strongest antagonist capability and stable hereditary stability was selected out.Aiming at estimating the increasing biological control effects of apple blue mold decay by mutant BA-16-8,the inhibition effects of bacterial broth and cell-free fermentation broth of mutant and wild-type strain were studied by biological control trial on fruit.The results showed that comparing with its wild type,the mutant displayed significantly higher effect on controlling apple blue mold disease.Therefore,the mutant BA-16-8will be a potential biological control agent against apple blue mold decay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorthern HorticultureSame topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207