MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2359227756

Study on the Effect of Different Treatments to Buchnera cruciatas Hamilt. Seed Germination Ability

2012· article· en· W2359227756 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Parasitism and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationBuchneraBiologyHorticultureAgronomySymbiosisBacteria
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wild Buchnera cruciatas Hamilt.resources are gradually reduced nowadays,the research reports of Buchnera cruciatas Hamilt.seed are very few.Study on the wild Buchnera cruciatas Hamilt.seed of Wangmo County in Guizhou province is carried out,the Buchnera cruciatas Hamilt.seed germination ability of different treatments is very different.The results show that the Buchnera cruciatas Hamilt.seed treated 6 h in low temperature soaking has the first white,higher germination rate and germination index,and the seed is suitable for growth in the pH 6.5 environment,Buchnera cruciatas Hamilt.seed can not germinate in excess acidic or alkali environment,at the same time,exerting a certain concentration of GA solution can make the seeds advance white germination,germination percentage and germination index will increase,but if the concentration is too high,it will make Buchnera cruciatas Hamilt.mildew.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicPlant Parasitism and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207