MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2359279920

The dust spatial distribution characteristic in spring and Northern Pacific region —— observation and simulation.

2005· article· en· W2359279920 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChina Environmental Science · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAeolian processes and effects
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubsidenceDust stormDeposition (geology)StormEnvironmental scienceSpring (device)Asian DustSpatial distributionAtmospheric sciencesMineral dustGeologyOceanographyClimatologyMeteorologyGeographyAerosolGeomorphologySediment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through the observation actual analysis and the numerical simulation of a strong dust storm event from mid-Asia at April 2001, the results showed that the dust from this storm was transported far to Korea, Japan, the Northern Pacific Ocean and Northern American continent through westerly jet flow. In Northern Pacific region the dust deposition depended mainly on three aspects: the exponential attenuation of dust deposition fluxes with increase of transport distance, the higher dust subsidence fluxes on the transport way, and the decision of dust subsidence spatial pattern by the raining spatial pattern at very great degree when the dust passed through the territory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it