Induction of Callus from Leaf Explants of Rhododendron hybridum and Its Regeneration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The technique system of induction of callus from leaf explants of Rhododendron hybridum and its re- generation were established.The results showed that Read+ZT 5.0 mg/L was the best medium to induce cal- lus from leaf explants.And Linear regression model y=19.21+7.32x_1 could estimate the growth condition of callus.Multiplication medium was the same as induction medium of callus.After 30 d inoculated,callus reached 3 times of its volume,2.5-4.5 times of its weight.Read+ZT 1.0 mg/L+NAA 0.10 mg/L was the best medium inducing callus to differentiate shoots and a high frequency could reach 87.5 %.The regenerated shoots rooted readily on Read medium plus 1.0 mg/L IBA 2.0 mg/L NAA and ZT 0.2 mg/L.The rate of roo- fing could reach 90%.The regenerate plants were acclimatized the soil of muck,yellow sand and perlite (5:1:1),the survival rate of plandets was 88.33%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".