MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2359456180

Whether State-Owned Enterprises per se Constitute "Public Bodies" within the Meaning of Article 1.1(a)(1) of the SCM Agreement——Comment on the WTO Dispute Case "United States-Definitive Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from Chin

2010· article· en· W2359456180 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gong Bai-hu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Trade Organization Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppealMeaning (existential)ChinaGovernment (linguistics)DisadvantageState (computer science)LawBusinessLaw and economicsPolitical scienceEconomicsEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On October,2010,the WTO panel publishes its decision on the Case United States-Definitive Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China,which decides that state-owned enterprises per se constitute public bodies within the meaning of Article 1.1(a)(1) of the SCM agreement.This decision could bring a long term disadvantage for Chinese enterprises when they meet the countervailing duties measures.This article argues that the panel decision has its defects on its reasoning.State-owned enterprise may constitute the public bodies within the meaning of Article 1.1(a)(1) of the SCM agreement,but not must be.This article encourages the Chinese government should appeal on this point.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.014
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0240.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicWorld Trade Organization LawFrench-language works237,207