MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2359510939

Analysis on the development of foreign countries' “Family Farms”

2014· article· en· W2359510939 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhou Zhong-l

Bibliographic record

VenueGuangdong nongye kexue · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaSubsidyFamily farmAgricultureBusinessEnlightenmentAgricultural economicsEconomic growthAgricultural scienceGeographyEconomicsMarket economy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Farm was first put forward in the No.1 Document of the Centre this year, which releasing the policy information of that family farm will be encouraged to be developed on the base of household operation of China. Family farm has a long history in the foreign countries. Taking the USA, Canada, Holland, Japan, etc. as the representatives, this paper analyzed the operation experience and lessons of foreign family farms. By other's faults, wise men correct their own. Through studying how the foreign countries operate their family farms, the enlightenment of operating family farms in China could be draw, which is in term of the identification criterion of family farm, farming land transfer, agricultural subsidies and the operation of technology and mechanization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGuangdong nongye kexueSame topicAgricultural Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207