Extended-Range Design of Domestic Tear Bomb Emitter
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to extend the fire range of the domestic Tear Bomb Emitter,its influence factors of fire range and muzzle velocity of projectile were analyzed theoretically,and the relationship between charge quantity,barrel length and muzzle velocity of projectile were analyzed quantitatively.A technical way of increasing charge quantity and barrel length was given to raise the muzzle velocity of projectile.Interior ballistic simulation was carried out by numerical simulation and the numerical recipes software MATLAB,and the rationality of charge quantity increase was validated.The balance design of the emitter was carried out by the parameterized entity model-building software Pro/Engineer after increasing the barrel length.The feasibility of both charge quantity increase and barrel length increase was validated by making use of the ball firing experiment.The research illustrates that both charge quantity increase and barrel length increase can improve muzzle velocity of projectile of the domestic Tear Bomb Emitter,and it also provides an accurate and practical method to extend the fire range of the emitter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it