U mineralization types and U mine exploration potential of Labrador in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Labrador is located in the eastern edge of the Canadian Shield,where the U mineralization are various in type. The most important mineralization is hosted in metamorphosed volcanic and sedimentary rocks,which is mainly distributed in Paleoproterozoic supracrustal rocks and intrusive rocks in the Central Mineral Belt( CMB)of Makkovik Province. The mineralization types in this area are Magma type( pegmatite and acidic volcanic rocks),Epigenetic-Hydrothermal type( some ones are similar to Fe oxide--Cu--Au( IOCG) type mineral deposit),Cut Tape type( may be the reason of metamorphism-accountable) and layered mineralization in sandy sedimentary rocks,but the typical unconformity are not found. On the base of mineralization types,combining with oreforming geological characteristics and mineralization geological data of deposits which have been found,we can analyze and conclude that some of the metallogenic prospect areas have great exploration potential,and we can get the delineation of White Bear Lake and Nash Lake exploration strategy selection of U deposit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".