MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2359932463

Fuzzy kNN Text Classifier Based on Gini Index

2006· article· en· W2359932463 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Guangxi Normal University · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Computational Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsNipissing University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePreprocessorCategorizationArtificial intelligenceClassifier (UML)Text categorizationBottleneckFuzzy logicMachine learningData miningPattern recognition (psychology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the development of Web, large numbers of documents are available on Internet. Automatic text categorization becomes more and more important for dealing with massive data. In numerous text categorization algorithms, kNN algorithm is proved one of the best text categorization algorithms. But for kNN classifier and other classifiers, text preprocessing before categorization is a bottleneck. The results of text preprocessing directly affect the categorization performance. This paper present a new text preprocessing algorithm-text preprocessing algorithm based on Gini index. At the same time, this paper adopt the theory of fuzzy sets to improve the decision rule of kNN algorithm. The combination of these two methods makes the fuzzy kNN classifier show better categorization performance than classical kNN algorithm. Experiment results show that our algorithm is effective and feasible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it