MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2360141847

Test Data Processing and Verification of Rolling Modeling for YUKUN Ship

2010· article· en· W2360141847 on OpenAlexaff
Xianku Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueCeshi jishu xuebao · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Computational Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSimple (philosophy)Data processingTest (biology)Basis (linear algebra)Experimental dataTest dataComputer scienceMarine engineeringEngineeringSimulationMathematicsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to build a mathematical responding model of ship roll for YUKUN ship,ship turning tests with 15°and 25° were carried out on 7 ships.And 14 groups rolling data were got.After verifying the accuracy of all kinds of data filtering methods,we applied a compound filtering method with higher precision to the dealing with practical ship test data of YUKUN ship.The indexes of rolling are presented on the basis of the compound filtering processing collaborated with the theoretical discussion.Finally,the responding mathematical model of YUKUN ship is given.The model is simple and easy to be analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCeshi jishu xuebaoSame topicAdvanced Computational Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207