MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2360143022

A study of relationships between distribution of vesicular monoamine transporter in brain and PD

2009· article· en· W2360143022 on OpenAlexaff
Tian Xiang-yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGABA and Rice Research
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVesicular monoamine transporterVesicular monoamine transporter 2Substantia nigraLocus coeruleusReserpinePars compactaVentral tegmental areaMonoamine neurotransmitterMPTPChemistryParkinson's diseaseDopamineDopamine transporterNeurosciencePharmacologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyMedicineSerotoninCentral nervous systemDopaminergicBiochemistryDisease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate the distribution of vesicular monoamine transporter(VMAT2) in brain and their relationships with Parkinson disease(PD).Methods PD model of C57BL mice induced by reserpine,MPTP,reserpine plus MPTP was used respectively and human embryonic brains of different parts(substantia nigrapars compacta,SNC),ventral tegmental areas(VTA) and locus coeruleus(LC) were examined by immunohistochemistrical staining and Western blot.Results The number of VMAT2-positive neurons and the number of TH-positive neurons in SNC were significantly reduced in PD model than the control,but there was no great difference in VTA and LC between PD model and the control.The distribution of VMAT2 in the control and human embryonic brains in SNC was less than that in both VTA and LC.Conclusion The amount of VMAT2 that has protective effect on the DA neurons in SNC is less than that in both VTA and LC.The weakage of the protecting function of VMAT2 in SNC may be the important cause of the selective DA neurons loss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGABA and Rice ResearchFrench-language works237,207