Application of Vancouver Scale in the Treatment of Keloids with ~(90)Sr Radiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To explore the clinical curative effects of the treatment of keloids with90 Sr radiation and to choose adaptive indications by Vancouver scale. Methods 105 patients with 131 keloids were involved in this study. These keloids scored by VSS in color and luster,thickness,vascularity,softness and were divided into two groups( Group A 0 ~ 8,Group B 9 ~ 15). The patients were followed up for 6 to 12 months after the treatment with90 Sr radiation for efficacy evaluation. Results The cure rate of 131 keloids was 48. 09%,and the improve rate was 51. 91%,and the total effective rate was 51. 91%. The radiation dose in Group A was 23. 5 ± 8. 2Gy,and the cure rate was 62. 69%,the adverse effect rate was 16. 42%. The radiation dose in Group B was 35. 1 ± 6. 2Gy,and the cure rate was 32. 81%,the adverse effect rate was 48. 48%. Conclusion Vancouver scale is a simple,effect and accurate method to select the appropriate keloid patients for90 Sr applicator therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".