MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2360240048

Analysis of Plate Making Principle of Printing

2009· article· en· W2360240048 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePackaging Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotopolymerization techniques and applications
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBending of platesPlate theoryHot platePhotographic plateComposite platePlate tectonicsMaterials scienceEngineeringEngineering drawingComposite materialStructural engineeringOpticsGeologyPhysicsFinite element method
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The plate making principles of photogravure plate,positive PS plate,negative PS plate,screen plate,waterless planographic plate,and silver diffusion plate were summarized.The rule whether the plate is intaglio plate or relief printing plate was concluded.It is helpful for students to understand the principles of plate making.Whether a plate is intaglio plate or relief plate is based on the types of negative film and photogelatin.It is fit for students to study the principles of plate making,especially for ones with poor chemical knowledge and less understanding of the decomposition and cure mechanism of photogelatin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it