Effect of Early Mental Intervention on Cognition and Body Function Rehabilitation of Patients with Cerebral Arterial Thrombosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To explore the effect of early mental intervention-assisted cognition and body function training on rehabilitation of patients with cerebral arterial thrombosis. Methods Sixty patients with ischemic stroke were randomly divided into intervention group and control group, 30 cases in each group. Pateints in the two groups were given cognition and body function rehabilitation training, mental intervention was plus in the intervention group. Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Barthel Index Assessment were used to evaluate cognitive function and daily living ability of patients. Results The scores of MoCA and BI of patients in the two groups were low before treatment, but were raised after treatment. The scores in the intervention group were more ideal than those in the control group (P 0.05). There was a positive correlation of time-effect between cognitive level and physical rehabilitation (r = 0.895, P 0.05). Conclusion Early mental intervention can conduce to improve the cognitive abilities of patients with cerebral arterial thrombosis, which make patients initiatively participate in body function rehabilitation training, and ultimately improve the activity of daily living of patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".