MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2360309651

Optimization of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Reaction System in Phalaenopsis

2012· article· en· W2360309651 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
HE Ke-qin

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEcology and Conservation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRAPDPrimer (cosmetics)DNAPhalaenopsisTaq polymeraseChemistryMolecular biologyPolymerase chain reactionSystem optimizationDNA extractionChromatographyDNA polymeraseBiologyBotanyBiochemistryMathematicsGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The modified SDS method was used for extraction DNA of Phalaenopsis,and reaction optimization of random amplified polymorphic based on progressive analysis of major factors to establish the best RAPD reaction system.The results showed that,concentration of DNA extracted reached 10 ng/μL,20 μL of optimized system was:0.5 μL of dNTPs(10 mmol/L),0.5 μL of DNA(10 ng/μL),2.4 μL of MgCl2(25 mmol/L),2 U of Taq polymerase,0.5 μL of primers(10 μmol/L),2 μL of 10×Buffer and 15.7 μL of ddH2O.Meanwhile,optimizing PCR procedure followed the 1 cycle of denaturing for 5 min at 94 ℃,42 cycles of denaturing for 1 min at 94 ℃,annealing for 1 min at 36 ℃,primer extension for 1.5 min at 72 ℃,and the last cycle of extension for 10 min at 72 ℃.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicEcology and Conservation StudiesFrench-language works237,207