MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2360344137

Study on the Relationship between Money Supply and Inflation Based on ECM Model

2005· article· en· W2360344137 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yu Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement Sciences in China · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsMoney supplyInflation (cosmology)Error correction modelMonetary economicsGranger causalityBroad moneyHyperinflationMonetary policyCausality (physics)Value (mathematics)Real interest rateQuarter (Canadian coin)MonetarismEconometricsMacroeconomicsCointegrationMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the econometric methods,such as co-integration analysis and error correction model,this paper develops a long-term equilibrium relationship and short-term dynamic relationship between money supply growth and inflation in China from the first quarter of 1994 to the fourth quarter of 2004.This study shows there is obvious co-integration relationship between all money supply growth and inflation rate,but increase of M2 has the strongest influence.The error correction models show the inflation rate has mechanism replied to balanced value.No matter at which level money supply growth is,Granger causality of the inflation is the cause.These proven inflation of our country remains a monetary phenomenon.The money policies have the final influence on the level of prices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement Sciences in ChinaSame topicEnvironmental and Agricultural SciencesFrench-language works237,207