MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2360467531 · doi:10.1504/ijmd.2016.076554

Short-term volatility and the long-term trend of the Canadian dollar on the foreign currency market

2016· article· en· W2360467531 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rayan Chelli, M. Humayun Kabir

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Management Development · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsLiberian dollarMonetary economicsU.S. Dollar IndexCurrencyVolatility (finance)SpeculationInterest rateReserve currencyCommodityDebtInflation (cosmology)Value (mathematics)International economicsFinancial economicsDevaluationMacroeconomicsUs dollarMarket economyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many factors affect the value of the Canadian dollar, such as expectations, commodity prices, budget and current account deficits, debt ratios, interest rates, political stability, and speculation. Because the Canadian economy heavily relies on foreign trade and investment, fluctuations in the value of the Canadian dollar have far-reaching implications for the nation's economic growth and stability. In this thesis, an attempt is made to understand the complex nature of the foreign currency markets and how the Canadian dollar has performed in the last three decades. The study has found that commodity prices, interest rate differentials, diverging inflation rates, and political events all have significant influence on the value of the dollar. The relative impact of each in part depends on the time horizon analysed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Management DevelopmentSame topicGlobal Financial Crisis and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207