The definition of triangle zone and its petroleum prospecting significance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Triangle zones normally develop in foreland fold-and-thrust belts and become favorable object of petroleum exploration.The geometry and nomenclature of triangle zones vary from place to place,among which Alberta-style triangle zone is of common significance.Progresses have been made on triangle zones in that a large number of work have been done at home and abroad in recent years.Based on physical and numerical modeling and integration of geological data,different kinematic and genetic models have been proposed,in which two kinematic models and a genetic model,prograding monocline model,are presented in this paper.Factors influencing the formation and development of triangle zones include decollement,variation of mechanical stratigraphy,syntectonic sedimentation,erosion and so on.Owing to their complexity in structure,triangle zones commonly have poor quality on seismic profiles.Consequently,seismic modeling and strata-in-growth method can be used to identify triangle zones.Seismic explorations demonstrate that triangle zones are widely distributed in zones around the basins in western China,and several examples are shown in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".