MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2360652773

Smooth ADS-B data by IMMKF for 3D display of airport situation

2015· article· en· W2360652773 on OpenAlexaff
LI Xin-shen

Bibliographic record

VenueSystems engineering and electronics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSimulation and Modeling Applications
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmoothnessKalman filterSmoothingFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceConstant (computer programming)Track (disk drive)Tracking (education)AccelerationAlgorithmSimulationControl theory (sociology)Computer visionReal-time computingMathematicsArtificial intelligencePhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to realize the 3Dsituation display of airport based on the automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast(ADS-B)data,its smoothing method is developed in the first step of airport 3Ddisplay.The ADS-B data must be pretreated because it is unsmooth with low accuracy for 3Ddisplay of the moving aircraft on airport surface.After smooth pretreatment,ADS-B data can be interpolated to high-frequency track data which is used for 3Ddisplay.So the interacting multiple model Kalman filter(IMMKF)algorithm is used to smooth the track.First,according to the actual movement of aircraft,three motion models with respect to constant acceleration,constant turn and constant velocity are constructed separately.Second,the IMMKF algorithm which combines IMM and Kalman Singer filter is used to track and smooth ADS-B data.Compared with other several classical filters,the experiment results indicate that this method achieves the lower failure probability of tracking with enough smoothness,realtime calculation and high accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSystems engineering and electronicsSame topicSimulation and Modeling ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207