MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W236067246

Kazuo Nakamura : The Method of Nature = Kazuo Nakamura : La méthode de la nature

2001· book· en· W236067246 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ihor Holubizky, Walter Klepac, Christopher Cutts

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Robert McLaughlin Gallery eBooks · 2001
Typebook
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Technology, and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParallelsAbstractionPaintingAbstract artArt historyArtPeriod (music)LiteraturePhilosophyEpistemologyAestheticsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This catalogue celebrates artist Nakamura’s contribution to the evolution of modern art in Canada. Curator Holubizky analyses art works produced between 1953 and 1964 by this member of Painters Eleven in light of the “crisis of abstraction” period. Klepac and Cutts examine the Number Structure Works initiated in the seventies and based on algorithmic patterns. Klepac also draws parallels between Nakamura’s practice and those of artists S. Le Witt and R. Opalka. Texts in French and English. List of works, biographical notes; 26 bibl. ref.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Robert McLaughlin Gallery eBooksSame topicArt, Technology, and CultureFrench-language works237,207