The analysis on the SPS measures on food additives notified by WTO numbers during 2010
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During 2010,the members of WTO have notified 203 WTO/SPS measures related food additives,among which China stands first,Canada and EU ran second and third separately.The United States notified few food additive related measures.EU is updating its food additive lists on the regulations.Canada focus on the notifications on enzyme in foodstuff.The Republic of Korea has notified several measures on a large amount of food additives which may have broad impression on the trade of other WTO numbers.Japan focus on the updating of the list of food additives.The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan,Penghu,Kinmen and Matsu notified the use of food additives on foods in capsule or tablet form.In 2010,China did a good job on the notification of food additive related measures,which are much concerned by other WTO numbers.China should continue to strengthen the notification,in particular,we should also actively study the measures notified by other numbers and submit our comments on them appropriately.The main work should focus on Strengthening the risk assessment on food additives and taking part in the work of Codex Committee on Food Additives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it