Bibliographic record
Abstract
Watermelon itself as receptor,the allelopathy of root water extract from grafted watermelon was studied by bioassay methods.The result showed that compared with the control,watermelon seed germination exhibited allelopathic promotion in 0.01 g/ml,0.02 g/ml and 0.04 g/ml root extract treatments,seed germination exhibited allelopathic inhibition in 0.08 g/ml root extract treatment,in which the allelopathic potential of 0.01 g/ml and 0.02 g/ml root extract treatment was better.In terms of watermelon seedling growth,root length or plant height improved and plant dry weight increased in 0.01 g/ml and 0.02 g/ml root extract treatments,which played allelopathic promotion on seedling growth.In 0.04 g/ml and 0.08 g/ml root extract treatments,watermelon seedling growth was inhibited,and the allelopathic potential of 0.08 g/ml root extract treatment was the best.The change of MDA content explained that plant was injury by high concentration extract treatment and growth was inhibited.As a whole,allelopathy of root water extract from grafted watermelon was stimulatory in lower concentration and inhibitory in higher concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".