Identification of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge. and Salvia przewalskii Maxim Seed through Chromosome in Root Tip
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[Objective] The seeds of Salvia militorrhiza Bge.and Salvia przewalskii Maxim were identified.[Method] Seeds were sprouted at 25 ℃.The root-tip with 0.5～1.0 cm length were cut and treated in 4 ℃ refrigerator for 24 hours,fixed for 1～1.5 hours with Carnoy’s fixative,differentiated for 10-15 min with hydrochloric acid and Ethanol 95 %(1∶1),pressed to section in carmine for staining. Them were observed under microscope,then the samples that differentiated well chosen,covered on frozen station with mountin Canada balsam(neutral mounting medium),for micro-photographing,counting and measuring.[Result]There were significant differences in the morphology and the structure.[Conclusion] Salvia militorrhiza Bge.and Salvia przewalskii Maxim seed can be identified effectively through chromosomal technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".