MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2361097685

Establishment of BHK-21 Stable Cell Lines Expressing T7 RNAP and GFP

2010· article· en· W2361097685 on OpenAlexaff
Hongbin He

Bibliographic record

Venue农业科学与技术(英文版) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipofectaminePlasmidTransfectionMolecular biologyBiologyGreen fluorescent proteinRecombinant DNAT7 RNA polymeraseGeneCell cultureVector (molecular biology)Escherichia coliBacteriophageGenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Objective] The aim was to establish the BHK-21 stable cell lines expressing T7 RNAP and GFP.[Method]T7 RNAP gene was amplified from E.coli BL21(DE3)and inserted into FG12 vector.The lenti-virus recombinant plasmid FG12-T7 RNAP plasmid was obtained via identification with double enzymes digestion and gene sequencing.The transient expressed T7 RNAP protein was determined by WB in 293T cells transfected with FG12-T7 RNAP plasmid.The recombinant FG12-RNAP lenti-virus was packaged up by transfecting the 293 cells with the recombinant vector FG12-RNAP and the helper plasmids via lipofectamine-2000,which was then used to infect BHK-21 cells.The positive cell clones were obtained after continuous screening by GFP.The expression of T7 RNAP gene was confirmed by Western blot.[Result]The cell line stably expressing the T7 RNAP gene was established by Western blot.[Conclusion]T7 RNAP gene could be stably expressed in eukaryotic cells and it provided a good platform to rescue RNA virus in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue农业科学与技术(英文版)Same topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207