Till Geochemistry in West-Central Manitoba: Interpretation of Provenance and Mineralization Based on Glacial History and Multivariate Data Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Till geochemical datasets from archived samples in west-central Manitoba are interpreted using multivariate data analytical techniques such as principal component analysis and pathfinder element index methods, combined with a spatial representation of the data in a geographic information system (GIS). Results show that carbonate till derived from Hudson Bay, as expressed by the (Ca + Mg)/Na ratio, is found predominantly east of Leaf Rapids and extends south into the Northeastern Kisseynew Domain. A 30- to 70-km-wide zone is documented beyond the limit of dissolvable carbonate dispersal that contains till of Labradorean provenance with low Ca-Mg-Mn-Te concentrations, noncalcareous till of Keewatin provenance, and silty calcareous till at depth. The variation in till provenance, together with the predominance of southwesterly ice-flow indicators, suggests that carbonate dispersal occurred prior to deglaciation, and that surface tills in the zone of confluence between Labradorean and Keewatin ice are likely the result of recycling of calcareous tills and/or carbonate-leached sandy tills, mainly by Keewatin ice. The newly defined limits of carbonate and Ca-rich till, typically used to assess provenance and glacial transport, provide a new framework for evaluating the significance of till geochemical patterns when drift prospecting over the Trans-Hudson orogen. Several regional- to local-scale dispersal trains from geochemically distinct bedrock sources are discussed in terms of elemental association, glacial transport characteristics, and potential bedrock sources. The multivariate statistical approach combined with GIS mapping also highlights new areas with small multi- or single-element enrichments that may be of further interest for volcanogenic massive sulfide exploration or for potentially more detailed drift sampling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".