Related research of the alexithymia characteristic and the event related potential P300 of hospitalized soldiers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the alexithymia characteristic and the event related potential P300 of the hospitalized soldiers in the polyclinic,and the relationship of the two. Method: Randomly selected 86 soldiers of the NO. 91. central hospital of P. L. A. as the research group,choose one 80 healthy men as the control group,two groups were given the Toronto alexithymia scale( TAS-20) and the event related potential P300 tests,and the results were statistically analyzed. Results: The research group's TAS-20 total score and each factor score were higher than the other one.( P 0. 05 or P 0. 05). While the N2,P3 latent period( PL) prolonged,P3 amplitude( Amp) reduced( P 0. 01). The correlation analysis found that N2 and P3 latent period of P300 showed significant positive correlation with the TAS-20 total score and each factor( r = 0. 296 ~ 0. 367,P 0. 05),while significantly negative correlated with the P3 amplitude. Conclusion: Certain degree of alexithymia and cognitive impairment exists among the hospitalized soldiers and cognitive function damage can objectively reflect the level of alexithymia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".