MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2361320704

Design and Development of the Apparatus for Rectifying Perpendicular of Steel Post in a Pile Pouring Concrete

2004· article· en· W2361320704 on OpenAlexaff
Zhong Bao-wen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSimulation and Modeling Applications
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerpendicularInclinometerPileStructural engineeringSIGNAL (programming language)EngineeringInterface (matter)Mechanical engineeringComputer scienceGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The building piles must be perpendicular at construction of high-rise building. Based on PLC, an apparatus using air sack to rectify perpendicular of steel post in a pile pouring concrete is introduced, which consists of electronic inclinometer, A/D converter, interface for signal input, control link for air pressure and human-machine interface(HMI). According to the principle of error control, the PLC (cooperated) with HMI is applied in construction of many buildings and produces good effect. The error of (inclination) is kept within 2‰.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSimulation and Modeling ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207