Views on gravomagnetic and electric exploration in Kuqa foreland basin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Kuqa foreland basin is located in the west of China.It has experienced two stages of gravomagnetic and electric exploration.The first stage of reconnaissance was conducted in the 1950s.The object was to deal with the regional geological problem,such as the depression-uplift division,the distribution of faults and the thickness of sedimentary rock,as well as to provide the prerequisite for the subsequent seismic survey.In the 1990s,the second stage of detailed gravomagnetic and electric survey was carried out.A few seismic surveys were performed.Some exploration wells were drilled,and oil and gas shows were found.In combination with seismic data,the mountain,mountain front,deep-seated strata,salt and sub-salt and local structures were depicted,and the exploration targets were evaluated.The research was focused on the problem that seismic data could not reveal clearly.Fruitful achievements have been obtained during all the segments of the two stages.The geological tasks,technical competence and measurement precision involved in the first stage were much different from the second one.The combination of gravomagnetic technique with the seismic methods made it possible to achieve satisfactory results in the comprehensive understanding of mountainous area and mountain front under the complex terrain and geologic settings on surface and subsurface with the aid of mutual complement of multiple disciplines and a variety of information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".