MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2361413458

Influence of Temperature and Diffusion Time on Manufacturing Procedure of High Silicon Steel by CVD Method

2013· article· en· W2361413458 on OpenAlexaff
Hongliang Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface Technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgy and Material Forming
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSiliconDiffusionMaterials scienceProcess (computing)Electrical steelDiffusion processComposite materialMetallurgyComputer scienceThermodynamics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

6.5%Si high silicon steel was manufactured by using CVD method and the process was introduced,the influence of temperature on the siliconizing rate and quality reducing rate,diffusion time on silicon distribution were investigated.Results as follows: the siliconizing rate will increase quickly when the temperature is higher than 1050 ℃,but the siliconizing rate will become steadily as the temperature up to 1200 ℃;The quality reducing rate will increase with the elevating of temperature and the rate will become steadily when the temperature is higher than 1200 ℃;The silicon will be well-distributed as the diffusion time is very sufficient,but it will be the highest efficient time when the Δw表-中/b≤5.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSurface TechnologySame topicMetallurgy and Material FormingFrench-language works237,207