MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2361413567

Application of GIS to the study on environmental geology

2010· article· en· W2361413567 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hong Tian-qiu

Bibliographic record

VenueResources Survey and Environment · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographic information systemGIS applicationsEnvironmental geologyVisualizationField (mathematics)PopularitySpatial analysisGIS and public healthChinaRemote sensingGeologyEnvironmental resource managementComputer scienceData scienceGeographyData miningEnvironmental scienceMetamorphic petrologyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper the development of GIS at home and abroad is reviewed,pointing out that GIS is gradually developing to the WebGIS,ComGIS,OpenGIS and three-dimensional GIS.On the basis of mentioned above,the environmental geology research is analyzed,focusing on the application of GIS to the environmental geology field.The application of GIS to geosciences in the United States,Canada,UK,Australia and other developed countries as well as to geological mapping,database building and mineral resources prognosis in China is analyzed systematically and the prospects of the application of GIS to the field of the environmental geology are summarized.In the end,the specific development directions of GIS are discussed,including commercial services on the Internet,increasing the popularity of digital geological map data applications,three-dimensional visualization and off-site heterogeneous geo-data processing in the WebGIS environment etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResources Survey and EnvironmentSame topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207