Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To study the application of umbilial blood flow monitoring in the prenatal examination. Methods:385 pregnant women,pregnancy of 24 +6 to 40 +6 weeks, were examined with foetal umbilical blood flow detector. The S/D?PI ?RI and FVR were measured by continuous ultrasonic detection of the fetal umbilical artery flow,then the result was analyzed by computer. Results: Abnormal umbilical blood flow was detected in 60 pregnant women(15.6%). The abnormal S/D was found in 36 casec (9.4%),and abnormal RI?PI and FVR in 24 cases(6.2%). Umbilical cord reeling fetal neck was found in 115 pregnant women(29.8%). The incidences of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) and neonatorum asphyxia significantly increased in pregnant women with abnormal umbilical blood flow ( P 0.05). Conclusions: The monitoring of umbilical blood flow is a good way in prenatal care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".