MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2361847232

SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF HYPERBRANCHED POLYCARBOSILAZANE

2006· article· en· W2361847232 on OpenAlexaff
Qingfa Si

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Polymerica Sinica · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrosilylationPolymer chemistryMaterials scienceBranching (polymer chemistry)MonomerSilylationPolymerizationPolymerSilyl etherEtherSiloxaneReactivity (psychology)AminolysisCatalysisOrganic chemistryChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to enhance the reactivity of the silyl-containing ceramic precursor,a hyperbranched silyl-containing polymer with low viscosity and plenty of terminal vinyl-groups was prepared.A novel AB_4 type monomer,bis(N,N-diallylamino)methylsilane,was synthesized first by aminolysis of MeHSiCl_2 and then was polymerized via hydrosilylation reaction using H_2PtCl_6 as the catalyst.The polymerization process was monitored by FT-IR spectroscopy.The polymer product was purified via precipitation using ethyl ether and acetonitrile and was analysed by using()~1H-NMR、()~(29)Si-NMR and FT-IR spectroscopy.The results indicated that the polymer was hyperbranched polycarbosilazane,and α-hydrosilylation was the main reaction.The degree of branching(DB) of the hyperbranched polymer was 0.56 calculated from the()~(29)Si-NMR spectrum,and the average molecular weight(M_w)was 13 580 g/mol determined by light scattering method.It was found that there still existed a lot of functional vinyl end groups,which can be used as promising reaction centers for curing or modification of the polycarbosilazane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Polymerica SinicaSame topicDendrimers and Hyperbranched PolymersFrench-language works237,207