MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2361947486

Sports-as-Spectacle and Sporting Spectacle:Roland Barthes' Semiotic Analysis of Sport Events

2011· article· en· W2361947486 on OpenAlex
Wei Wei

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTiyu kexue · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSports, Gender, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectacleSemioticsEmbodied cognitionMythologyArtPoeticsLiteratureAestheticsSociologyArt historyPhilosophyEpistemologyPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Roland Barthes,the great French philosopher and semiotician,developed a special interest in spectator sports and influential public sport events.He published a number of articles on sports-as-spectacle and sporting spectacle.In The World of Wrestling,the first essay in his Mythologies,Barthes gave a micro-semiotic analysis to wrestling.In The Tour de France as Epic,also collected in the same book,he went a step further and,through meso-semiotic analysis,discussed the general significations demonstrated in the bicycle racing in France.Barthes' relatively complete semiotic views on sport events are embodied in What is Sport,the script he wrote for a Canadian documentary film called Le Sport et les hommes which attempts to explore the phenomenology and poetics of five national sports.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it