MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2361960366

Robust control of unstable process with dual pole

2008· article· en· W2361960366 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSystems engineering and electronics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Overshoot (microwave communication)Settling timeProcess (computing)Full state feedbackRobust controlController (irrigation)Control engineeringProcess controlMaglevEngineeringControl systemComputer scienceStep responseControl (management)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to improve the design method of robust controller for an unstable process,the unstable process with dual pole is divided into two parts,a pure unstable process plus a general stable process.For the pure unstable process loop shaping and mirror-injection method are used,while a controller based on pole cancellation rule is directly designed for the general stable process.The robust controller is finally solved by the closed-loop gain shaping algorithm.The robust controller is used to the suspension control of a maglev train.The simulation results show that the control effects can reach rapid settling time(0.1 s) with small overshoot(8%) and without steady-state error and have satisfactory robust stability to model perturbation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.151
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it