MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2362205049

The Optimal Conditions of Transgenetic System of Lettuce Against Dental Caries

2012· article· en· W2362205049 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chen Zhu, Jianguo Liu, Zhang Yan, MA Xinrong, Wu Jiayan, Ling Tang, Xiaoyan Guan, Yu Gu, Guohui Bai

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformation (genetics)HorticultureBiologyBotany
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective:To obtain optimal conditions of lettuce transgenetic system,which could provide the condition for the further transformation study of transgenic plant expression vector against dental caries.Method:By using the six different varieties lettuce as explants,the technology of plant regeneration was studied.Several factors such as bud ratio,hormone concentration and the antibiotic selection pressure and so on,were investigated to optimize the regeneration system in vitro.Result:The experimental results showed that compared with six different varieties of lettuce,The seed of Yi Dali lettuce sprout fastest and its bud ratio is the highest.It is shown that the best optimal conditions is that the 3-4 day old lettuce plant cotyledon grew on the 1/2 MS+0.05 mg/L NAA+0.1 mg/L 6-BA medium;It was optional to choice 50 mg/L paromomycin as the antibiotic selection pressure.Conclusion:The conditions of lettuce transgenetic system,which should provide to transformation of transgenic plant expression vector against dental caries,were successfully constructed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207