MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2362240332

A Review of Canadian Graduate Education

2007· review· en· W2362240332 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhao Mingyu

Bibliographic record

VenueWaiguo jiaoyu yanjiu · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicResearch, Science, and Academia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraduate educationGraduate studentsHigher educationMedical educationQuality (philosophy)Political scienceMedicineLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When Canadian graduate education system was created in the metaphase and anaphase of the 19th century,Master's education was attached importance to,but Doctor's education was waiting for developing.The graduate education was developed enough at the beginning of the 20th century,and made for maturity gradually after the Second World War.Nowadays,the characters of every university graduate education vary from one to another,while there is some commonness among them.Every step of Canadian graduate education is cautious and strict.The Canadian Association for Graduate Studies offers a communicating and developing platform;the rigorous eliminate rate ensures the education quality;the meticulous psychological guidance is necessary to guarantee of the Canadian graduate education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.011
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.598
GPT teacher head0.571
Teacher spread0.028 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWaiguo jiaoyu yanjiuSame topicResearch, Science, and AcademiaFrench-language works237,207