MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2362262462

Zircon U-Pb geochronology and Hf isotope geochemistry of metamorphic quartz-monzonite porphyry from Tongkuangyu area, Zhongtiao Mountain and its geological implications

2013· article· en· W2362262462 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGeochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral Deposits
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuartz monzoniteZirconGeologyGeochronologyGeochemistryPetrogenesisMetamorphic rockPorphyry copper depositCratonPetrologyQuartzPlutonFluid inclusionsPaleontologyTectonicsMantle (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The formation time of the metamorphic quartz-monzonite porphyry associated with the Tongkuangyu porphyry copper deposit is still controversy. A set of zircon U-Pb geochronology and in-stiu Hf isotopic date was presented in this study for the metamorphic quartz-monzonite porphyry. The result show that the discordia upper intercept age 2121 ± 10Ma and 207 Pb / 206 Pb age range from 2065Ma to 2196Ma,have a weighted average age 2117 ± 13Ma. This age ( 2117 ± 13Ma) is accounted as the formation time of the metamorphic quartz-monzonite porphyry from Tongluangyu porphyry copper deposit,and is approximately consistent with the extension of the North China Craton ( NCC) ,especially the activity of Zhongtiao rift which is located in the southern part of NCC. In addition,zircons Hf isotopic characteristics ( e Hf ( t) range from - 7. 79 to 0. 39) indicate that the old crustal materials played an important role in the petrogenesis. So,we conclude that the Tongkuangyu porphyry Cu deposit is a typical porphyry Cu deposit formed in inner continental settings,which genetic with the large-scale extension of the NCC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral DepositsFrench-language works237,207