Clinical Observation of Acupuncture Combined with Massage Manipulation on Treating Facet Joints Disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To observe the clinical effect of acupuncture combined with massage manipulation on treating facet joints disorder. Methods: 64 cases were randomly divided into the treatment group and the controlled group,each group was 32 cases. The treatment group was treated by acupuncture combined with massage manipulation,the controlled group was treated by simple massage manipulation as treatment group,2 days 1 time,3 times to be a period of treatment,total treatment 6 times, and in before and after treatment used McGill scale to evaluate. Results: After the treatment,7 cases was cured,22 cases was better,3 cases was invalid in the treatment group,the total effective rate was 90. 6%; 7 cases was cured,20 cases was better, 5 cases was invalid in the controlled group,the total effective rate was 84. 4%. McGill scale evaluation: After the treatment, the PRI,VAS and PPI of both groups of patients were significantly lower( P 0. 001),and the dropped degree had significant difference( P 0. 05). Conclusion: Acupuncture combined with massage manipulation for thoracic spinal with small joint disorders has a certain extent of therapeutic effect and is better than simple massage manipulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".