Clinical Observation of Acupuncture Combined with Massage Manipulation on Treating Facet Joints Disorder
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To observe the clinical effect of acupuncture combined with massage manipulation on treating facet joints disorder. Methods: 64 cases were randomly divided into the treatment group and the controlled group,each group was 32 cases. The treatment group was treated by acupuncture combined with massage manipulation,the controlled group was treated by simple massage manipulation as treatment group,2 days 1 time,3 times to be a period of treatment,total treatment 6 times, and in before and after treatment used McGill scale to evaluate. Results: After the treatment,7 cases was cured,22 cases was better,3 cases was invalid in the treatment group,the total effective rate was 90. 6%; 7 cases was cured,20 cases was better, 5 cases was invalid in the controlled group,the total effective rate was 84. 4%. McGill scale evaluation: After the treatment, the PRI,VAS and PPI of both groups of patients were significantly lower( P 0. 001),and the dropped degree had significant difference( P 0. 05). Conclusion: Acupuncture combined with massage manipulation for thoracic spinal with small joint disorders has a certain extent of therapeutic effect and is better than simple massage manipulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it