MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2362963818

Temporal-spatial distribution of epidemics in Ming and Qing dynasties (1368-1911A.D.) in China

2009· article· en· W2362963818 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeographical Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaGeographyDistribution (mathematics)Spatial distributionYangtze riverPhysical geographyCartographyDemographySocioeconomicsArchaeologyRemote sensing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human health is affected by global environmental change(GEC).The distribution and transmission of epidemics in history could be rebuilt to reveal the relationship between health and GEC from the past.This study used the collected data of epidemics in the Ming and Qing periods,when China was seriously influenced by epidemics,to set up some indicators to quantitatively analyze the temporal-spatial distribution of epidemics by GIS and geo-statistics methods.The results are as follows: (1) The indicators of of Incident of Epidemics in 10 Years and Number of Incident of Epidemics in 10 Years were set up to analyze the temporal distribution of epidemics in China.The results show that the epidemics were more and more frequent from the early Ming to late Qing Dynasty.After 1840 A.D.,they happened nearly every year.1580~1589A.D.,1639~1648 A.D.,1813~1822 A.D.and 1857~1866 A.D.were the four peaks of frequency and scale of epidemics. (2) The indicators of Percentage of Incident of Epidemics to Total Years and Percentage of of Epidemics to the Total Counties were set up to analyze the spatial distribution of epidemics.The results show that many areas were affected by epidemics in the whole Ming and Qing dynasties.But the incidental frequency verified largely in different areas.The high frequency and the high incident areas descended from the east coastal area to the inland area.The middle and lower reaches of Yellow River and Yangtze River were the regions with the highest frequency.The epidemics occurred in all the eastern and central provinces.Over 80% of the counties in Beijing,Tianjin,Shanghai,Hainan,Fujian,Anhui,Jiangxi,Shandong and Zhejiang were affected by epidemics. (3) The indicator of Proportion of Accumulated Incident of Epidemics to the Total Years was set up to quantitatively analyze both the occurrence frequency and the affected regional scales.The results show that Shanghai,Zhejiang and Shandong were the highest with Proportion of Accumulated Incident of Epidemics to the Total Years,indicating that occurrences in these provinces were both high frequency and large scales.Further studies should be done on their relations with droughts and floods,socioeconomic development and the distribution of population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it