MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2363067698

Preparation of Cationic Starch Immobilized by β-Cyclodextrin and Its Application in Antibacterial Paper

2014· article· en· W2363067698 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChina Pulp & Paper · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyclodextrinEpichlorohydrinCationic polymerizationStarchUltimate tensile strengthChemistryNuclear chemistryAntibacterial activityChromatographyPolymer chemistryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryComposite materialBacteria
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The preparation of cationic starch immobilized by β-cyclodextrin( β-CD-CS) and its application in papermaking after forming inclusion complexes with ciprofloxacin hydrochloride( CipHCl) were studied. The results showed that the optimal conditions of synthesizing β-CD-CS were as follows: the molar ratio of epichlorohydrin to β-CD was 5∶ 1 and the reaction temperature was at 40℃. With the amount of β-CD-CS used for forming the inclusion complex increasing,the tensile strength,tear strength and bursting strength of the paper sheets increased firstly and then decreased. It also showed that the antibacterial effect of the paper sheets containing the inclusion complexes was excellent and increased with the higher adding amount of the inclusion complexes. When the adding amount of the inclusion complexes was 2. 5%,the inhibition zones of the paper sheets against E. coli and S. aureus were 16. 9 mm and 16. 3 mm respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it