MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2363152465

Synthesis and Characterization of Fe_2O_3/La_2O_3/CNTs Catalyst for Water Treatment with Microwave Technology

2007· article· en· W2363152465 on OpenAlex
Wei‐bo Yuan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCailiao daobao · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalysisPhenolMaterials scienceCarbon nanotubeX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyMicrowaveNuclear chemistryLanthanumCarbon fibersWastewaterChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryChemistryComposite numberNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryWaste managementComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon nanotubes-supported Fe2O3/La2O3 catalysts are synthesized by chemical liquid deposition-microwave irradiation, using Fe(OH)3 and La(OH)3 as iron and lanthanum sources. Pure alcohol is added to disperse the HNO3 pretreated carbon nanotubes. Fe3+ and La3+ are added respectively. After the samples are irradiated, the catalysts are characterized by TEM, XRD, XPS, and are applied in the treatment of high concentration phenol wastewater, by microwave enhanced catalytic wet oxidation. In simulating the treatment of phenol wastewater, at the concentration of 5000 mg/L, the optimal treatment conditions are as follows: the microwave power is 700W, the irradiation time is 5min, the microwave working pressure is 0.4 MPa, the catalyst concentration is 0.125~2.5g/L, the H2O2 concentration is 25g/L and the pH of the system is equal to or below 8.0. The removal rate of phenol in the water reaches 80%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it