MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2363205890

Some Issues on Educational Anthropology Development in China

2009· article· en· W2363205890 on OpenAlex
YU Ying-li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Northwest Normal University · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAnthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApplied anthropologySociocultural anthropologyFour field approachEducational anthropologySociologyAnthropologyPerspective (graphical)FrontierCurriculumAnthropology of artEducation theoryDigital anthropologyFunction (biology)PedagogyEthnographyHigher educationPolitical scienceHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Educational anthropology,anthropology,education,and national education have close and intricate relationship from its beginning.This paper,through review of the relationship in educational anthropology,anthropology,education,and national education,believes that the curriculum should not only embody the characteristic of anthropology,but also play the special function of pedagogy to show the human nature and development in education and its requirement to education.From the perspective view of the relationship between the disciplines,educational anthropology is frontier science between education pedagogy and anthropology.Educational anthropology and national education have both similarities and differences,and their names can not be mixed.But they can learn research results from each other and promote the common development of disciplines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it