Manipulation plus low frequency electrotherapy for acute closed soft tissue injury in athletes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of manipulation plus low frequency electrotherapy on athletes with acute closed soft tissue injury. Methods 60 athletes with acute closed soft tissue injury caused by training were divided into control group (n=30, received conventional RICE therapy) and therapy group (n=30, received manipulation plus low frequency electrotherapy). After 2 courses of treatment (7 days as a course of treatment), the McGill pain questionnaire was used to evaluate the pain relief and clinical effects before and after treatment. Results The scores of McGill pain questionnaire decreased after treatment in the two groups. The pain relief index (0.61±0.14), excellent and good rate (66.7%), and total effective rate (93.3%) in therapy group were significantly higher than those in control group (0.52 ± 0.17,40.00%,83.33%, respectively) after treatment (P 0.05). Conclusion Manipulation plus low frequency electrotherapy can obviously relieve the pain symptom of athletes with acute closed soft tissue injury, and the excellent and good rate and total effective rate were higher than those in control group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".