MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2363293086

CBI Teaching Model of College English:Problems and Measures

2012· article· en· W2363293086 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shao Junhan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Shanghai Finance University · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSecond Language Learning and Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumMathematics educationChinaForeign languageCompetence (human resources)Language educationPsychologyCollege EnglishTeaching methodSet (abstract data type)PedagogyForeign language teachingLinguistic competenceComputer sciencePolitical scienceLinguisticsSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Content-Based Instruction(CBI) teaching model intends to develop students' language competence through academic subjects teaching.It has achieved impressive success in Canadian bilingual education,and thus set a good example for China's foreign language teaching reform.Due to the differences in language social environment,teaching faculty's foreign language competence,and teaching materials,CBI in China is confronted with some problems,such as the choice of target knowledge of teaching,textbook construction,and the deployment of teaching stuff.According to the time of CBI subjects in curriculum,their importance and levels of difficulty,it is advisable to choose some compulsive courses for CBI.Furthermore,some other proposals and measures need to be considered in terms of the educational characteristics in China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Shanghai Finance UniversitySame topicSecond Language Learning and TeachingFrench-language works237,207